On 24 December 2011 19:32, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> I have prepared changes to the OSMI map that allow me to > > * treat untagged nodes as clean if moved by an agreeing mapper Nice > * treat any tags contributed by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless if > these tags are not present any more in the current version Also nice - two clarifications would be useful, if you could briefly give them: 1. This would, I suppose, mean that a formerly "tainted" node which has both been moved and stripped of any "tainted" tags would also be considered clean. Is this so, or is the moved node rule implemented as a special case that can only every apply to untagged nodes? 2. Consider the case of a node that is mapped by an agreeing mapper as a restaurant. A non-agreeing mapper comes along and adds cuisine=pizza. An agreeing mapper "cleans" the object by removing this tag. Time passes... Another mapper walks by, notices that the place is a pizzeria and adds back an identical tag. Are we clean or dirty now? > * treat any nodes added to a way by a non-agreeing mapper as harmless > if these nodes are not present any more in the current version of > the way Excellent. So this will have the effect of ignoring the edit by the non-agreeing mapper in the _way's_ history, right? Thanks for the clarifications. Indeed, thanks for this awesome resource. Dermot -- -------------------------------------- Igaühel on siin oma laul ja ma oma ei leiagi üles _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
