El Sábado, 8 de Septiembre de 2007 12:26, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Thanks Jeremy, that was exactly the problem. I've uploaded the updated > gcc.patch file. I just removed the '^' so the sed only matches what > current trunk matches, rather than the ld-uClibc.so.0 entry as well which > your '/lib/ld/@' version would.
On the gcc.patch file, into the chunk chapter05/gcc-pass2.xml, in the sed and surroinding text that replaces the gcc-specs-patch there is references to linux64.h, /lib64/ld, and /lib32/ld. Don't should that references be left-out until x86_64 support merge? -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
