Matthew Burgess wrote: > Jeremy, did you have to make any changes to the toolchain adjustment phase to > cater for GCC-4.2.1?
I made changes to adjusting.xml for the sake of adding compatibility for x86_64 _before_ I upgraded to gcc 4.2.1. So I'm guessing I avoided what you're hitting now. Here's what is in trunk: gcc -dumpspecs | sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/tools&@g' \ > `dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs And here's what's in the jh branch: gcc -dumpspecs | sed 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools&@g' \ > `dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs Apart from the use of a possible /lib64, the biggest difference is that I don't specify to find the name of the linker at the beginning of a line, because that's not where it appears for x86_64 (and I'm guessing for gcc-4.2.1 on x86 it doesn't appear there either). Can you confirm if the following works? gcc -dumpspecs | sed 's@/lib/ld@/tools&@g' \ > `dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs I would diff the above with the original output of -dumpspecs to make sure it only hits what you want. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
