..on Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:24:39PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:08:48PM -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: > > Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default > > been broached? Maybe I'm the only one that trips over it so often. best, Joe > > This is something that has been debated numerous, and I do mean *numerous*, > times over the past few decades. That said, I'd recommend (a) removing > the "Reply-To" header from the list's config and (b) using the "mutt" > email client, which is the best one I'm aware of and -- if you configure > it with "edit_headers=yes" -- makes it very very very easy to see what > you're doing *and* change it if it's not whta you want to be doing. > Mutt is lightweight, fast, portable, usable as-is, very customizable, > and presents a much smaller attack surface than many other mail clients. > > I've used a *lot* of mail clients over the years; so far, mutt's the best.
Hear here. 10 years with mutt across numerous machines and it's still the client that sucks the least. It takes a little learning at first, but those hours are well worth it. Cheers, -- Julian Oliver http://julianoliver.com http://criticalengineering.org -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
