Can we just vote already? This is getting out of hand and a perfect example why this list is increasingly useless with too many flame wars and not enough substantive content...
On Mar 20, 2013, at 13:52, Gregory Foster <gfos...@entersection.org> wrote: > If we're going to require people to use their brains, perhaps its not too > much to ask that individuals take responsibility for paying attention to who > they are speaking to. > > This is not a personally configurable setting on the mailing list software, > and we're relegated to a dualistic choice that cannot satisfy all > participants, yet we still must choose and have previously chosen. If this > will be a recurring issue, perhaps we should structure a yearly survey/vote. > > gf > > > On 3/20/13 12:37 PM, Matt Mackall wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 18:02 +0200, Maxim Kammerer wrote: >>>> Isn't that a valid point? >>> No, it's a useless imaginary construct. A valid point would be an >>> example (preferably, more than one) of such an email on this list, >>> where it would be possible to debate whether the person actually >>> deserved losing his job / life for hastily sending said email. >> Am I reading this correctly? You need to personally witness someone make >> a potentially fatal mistake before you'll take a risk seriously? >> >> If you're unwilling to employ foresight as a decision-making aide, you >> may not be taking full advantage of your prefrontal cortex. >> > > -- > Gregory Foster || gfos...@entersection.org > @gregoryfoster <> http://entersection.com/ > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
