On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote: [...] > I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values. > What if instead of using a different return value, we don't reset > base->event_gotterm and base->event_break when triggered? We can reset > them at the beginning of event_base_loop() instead.
How would you inspect them? The event_base structure isn't exposed in any public headers. I suppose we could add a new accessor function. I like the idea of the original patch, but I'm also concerned about return values. If anyone has written code like "if (event_base_loop(base,0)<0)" or "if (event_base_loop(base,0)==-1)", they'll get unexpected results. -- Nick _______________________________________________ Libevent-users mailing list Libevent-users@monkey.org http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
