-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 10.02.2016 17:38, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Peter Rosin wrote: >> I agree wholeheartedly with the notion that --disable-static should e nd >> up in a failure and not somehow degrade to a static build anyway. I > Is this not the case? I have seen builds on Windows fail due to using > --disable-static. > > Libtool is not well optimized for Windows or even GNU Linux. Instead it > provides a working generalized solution which is usually "good enough" . Let's make Libtool even better. :) I suggest to add LT_INIT options "no-fallback-to-static", "fallback-to-static" and add warning when producing static instead of shared that this behaviour can be changed in future versions of libtool. Later make "no-fallback-..." default. Is it possible that such patch will be accepted for Libtool? - -- Best Wishes, Evgeny Grin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWu5hdAAoJEL96xKXqwrr0BTUH/0YtsVO4A1MxME2Ai6yuEylI 31H5jn7fvRXXIH2DNJJniT5A0jFgOiUzQHcO2AzQV1D0XLiwcc/6v7s7UP0xi3VR Upj8UNhP/wiMaCzh2R1fSAG5KyQlk5ebwpY/d4P+WINRun5wkg8+0ig7eTFrt0/3 mzIRjj9LKlU1JcnAZXLo1onpoKap6C6HR89WDDx9Q6rbMjcop4GPaa6XLEFRU2fb rElF+yekxXwly8NmzdWOY6pptP9HdtTiU8iisUZlT2jHdNJx1m9vu2NTZ3zxJFXE 67j9Zv0WuFib5Xk1894QRCw7j19wUfd/XOROJgOlWWGB9latL7ue6FJQIHdzI/U= =QxVZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
