Am 19. Juli 2016 18:11:14 MESZ, schrieb "Joel C. Salomon"
<joelcsalo...@gmail.com>:
>On 2016-07-19 2:45 AM, tisimst wrote:
>> It could be a LaissezVibrer tie, but I'm wondering if there isn't a
>> connection to the next bar. The tie extends so far and touches the
>> BarLine at the end of that measure that makes me wonder, but it's
>only
>> speculation at this point. Given the ending tip's vertical position,
>> too, it almost looks like it could be a slur. What does the next bar
>> look like?
>
>The next bar doesn’t have any partial ties or slurs.
But is there an a or any other note that could reasonably be tied or slurred to
in the next measure?
From my experience as editor this really looks like a broken tie or slur where
the engraver forgot to supply the second part. This happens extremely often.
Best would be an image of the next system.
Urs
>Other scores in
>the same book do have indications of ties continued across line-breaks,
>so I’m reasonable sure this was not accidentally omitted here.
>
>Experimenting with the `\extendLV` function verifies Robin Bannister’s
>original caveats:
>
>> You could however make it _look_ longer, but then
>> - you have to guess how much
>> - it may collide with something.
>
>so while `\laissezVibrer` is cleaner code, I think I’ll stick with my
>
> #(define afterGraceFraction (cons 1 1))
> \afterGrace a1( {s32)}
>
>hack.
>
>Thank you all,
>—Joel C. Salomon
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
