Kees van den Doel <kvand...@shaw.ca> writes: > Of course there is nothing really wrong with the current website. > Most people will want to just download lilypond and try it out; who > has time to read all the crap on a product's website? Once they've > clicked on the downloaded icon on their screen something reasonable > should happen.
Well, but Lilypond's whole operation is not "something reasonable". If they get what amounts to a demo run, that won't take them any further in the process of creating scores. So the question is what action from the clicking on the "downloaded icon" will be the fastest leading to the average unsuspecting user writing and processing their first "Michael row the boat ashore" kind of file. I have no good answer for that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
