Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: >> > If you can suggest an improvement, especially in the >> > Introduction pages, please do. >> >> LilyPondTool, Frescobaldi, Emacs and Vim are listed under >> "Alternate Input." Since this link is to the right of "Text >> Input," the implication is that they are alternatives to text >> input, which of course is false: All the information under the >> "Text input" link applies to these programs. > > Hmm. I'm trying to tie these two together: text input and > alternate input are both the same color, and end in "input". > >> Maybe change "Alternate Input" to "Input software," or "Input >> programs," or "Progams, At least One of Which You Will Use to Enter >> Your Scores if You At All Value Your Time and Sanity." > > I'm willing to change the name, but I'm not convinced that any of > thsoe are more attractive than "alternate input". More to the point, > the bottom of "text input" tries to direct people there, with the > "easier editing environments" stuff.
"Input aids". > Hmm, on second thought, what about calling it "Easier editing"? That > alliterates, so it gets a 20% bonus to its attractiveness. :) But it is mostly wrong since the graphical programs usually don't allow editing existing input at all, but rather _generate_ or export Lilypond input. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
