Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > '-n'is already taken, I'm rather thinking of --dry-run like in the 'patch' > > tool. > > Maybe useful too, but different from what I was asking about ;-)
Patience.. :) > I thought -t 2 was the --dry-run from Boeblingen? Actually that was -t 0 (the default). -t 2 was the opposite, i.e. something like '--now-for-real'. Regards, Peter Oberparleiter -- Peter Oberparleiter Linux on zSeries Development IBM Development Lab, Boeblingen/Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
