--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Chris Cannam <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1 > To: "torbenh" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 7:38 AM > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM, > torbenh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a > feature freeze, > > i added some features. > > > > - smp aware > > - clickless connections > > Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over > jack2? > and would I assume correctly that one of the reasons to not let the jack1 codebase "die" (or freeze) is that it is written in C as opposed to jack2 ? J. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
