On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:02:39PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > for some more anecdotal evidence, this is about what i was seeing during > my jack1/2 comparison tests. jack2 generally required one buffer size > step more to achieve the same xrun robustness as jack1. but i'm > generally able to use much lower latencies down to 64 (or 128 in the > jack2 case), unless i use jconvolver, which forces me to go to at least > 1024 so as not to max out the cpu.
That doesn't make much sense. You can instruct jconvolver to use a minimum period size that is larger than the one Jack* is running. -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
