4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com>
commit 4e3f0701f25ab194c5362576b1146a1e6cc6c2e7 upstream.
__add_badblock_range() does not account sector alignment when
it sets 'num_sectors'. Therefore, an ARS error record range
spanning across two sectors is set to a single sector length,
which leaves the 2nd sector unprotected.
Change __add_badblock_range() to set 'num_sectors' properly.
Fixes: 0caeef63e6d2 ("libnvdimm: Add a poison list and export badblocks")
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
@@ -421,14 +421,15 @@ static void set_badblock(struct badblock
static void __add_badblock_range(struct badblocks *bb, u64 ns_offset, u64 len)
{
const unsigned int sector_size = 512;
- sector_t start_sector;
+ sector_t start_sector, end_sector;
u64 num_sectors;
u32 rem;
start_sector = div_u64(ns_offset, sector_size);
- num_sectors = div_u64_rem(len, sector_size, &rem);
+ end_sector = div_u64_rem(ns_offset + len, sector_size, &rem);
if (rem)
- num_sectors++;
+ end_sector++;
+ num_sectors = end_sector - start_sector;
if (unlikely(num_sectors > (u64)INT_MAX)) {
u64 remaining = num_sectors;
