Am 07.08.2017 00:51, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> In the lines above this test, 8 'kzalloc' are performed, but only 7 results
> are tested.
> 
> Add the missing one (i.e. '!ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply').
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> index 1a5b6e40fb5c..8a44636ab0b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -5494,10 +5494,10 @@ mpt3sas_base_attach(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
>       ioc->ctl_cmds.status = MPT3_CMD_NOT_USED;
>       mutex_init(&ioc->ctl_cmds.mutex);
>  
> -     if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->transport_cmds.reply ||
> -         !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply || !ioc->tm_cmds.reply ||
> -         !ioc->config_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply ||
> -         !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
> +     if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply ||
> +         !ioc->transport_cmds.reply || !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply ||
> +         !ioc->tm_cmds.reply || !ioc->config_cmds.reply ||
> +         !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
>               r = -ENOMEM;
>               goto out_free_resources;
>       }


obviously it is better to follow the pattern "malloc() , check".
Even the programmer lost track.

Bonus points if you malloc the buffers in one step.

just my 2 cents,

re,
 wh


Reply via email to