Hi Stephen, Às 11:25 PM de 12/27/2017, Stephen Boyd escreveu: > We have macros for getting the upper or lower 32 bits of a > number. Use them here to shave a couple lines off the code > and provide clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> > --- > > Changes from v1: > * Update dw_msi_setup_msg() too > * Reword commit text slightly > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > index 81e2157a7cfb..454b8d244071 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > @@ -89,10 +89,8 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data); > > /* program the msi_data */ > - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO, 4, > - (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff)); > - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI, 4, > - (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff)); > + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO, 4, lower_32_bits(msi_target)); > + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI, 4, upper_32_bits(msi_target)); > } > > static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) > @@ -189,8 +187,8 @@ static void dw_msi_setup_msg(struct pcie_port *pp, > unsigned int irq, u32 pos) > else > msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data); > > - msg.address_lo = (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff); > - msg.address_hi = (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff); > + msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target); > + msg.address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target); > > if (pp->ops->get_msi_data) > msg.data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, pos); >
Thanks for the patch. Gustavo' patch-set targeting the update of the Interrupt API for pcie-designware* already does this modification, so I would suggest that we wait for Gustavo' patch to be stable and get the same modification. Best regards, Joao Pinto
