>> When this is sorted out, should I keep the previous patch [1] applied >> as well? > > That doesn't hurt.
OK, I've used just the latter patch (because I somehow believe the first one lowers the probability of bad behavior), so let's see if kswapd consumes CPU again. I don't have any test patter to trigger that CPU usage, though... Cheers and thanks for your time, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
