Hi Shimoda-san,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:23 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com> wrote:
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 5:53 PM
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 3:56 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> > <yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c
> >
> > > @@ -200,12 +277,14 @@ static int bd9571mwv_probe(struct i2c_client
> > > *client,
> > >
> > > static const struct of_device_id bd9571mwv_of_match_table[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "rohm,bd9571mwv", },
> > > + { .compatible = "rohm,bd9574mwf", },
> > > { /* sentinel */ }
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bd9571mwv_of_match_table);
> > >
> > > static const struct i2c_device_id bd9571mwv_id_table[] = {
> > > - { "bd9571mwv", 0 },
> > > + { "bd9571mwv", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9571 },
> > > + { "bd9574mwf", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9574 },
> >
> > Why add the chip types? These are unused, and the driver uses
> > autodetection of the chip variant anyway.
>
> I just added the chip types in the future use. As you said,
> these are unused and we should not add a future use in general.
> So, I'll remove this change.
OK.
> Also, I think I should remove the following patch.
>
> [PATCH v4 08/12] gpio: bd9571mwv: Add BD9574MWF support
You mean removing the chip types from bd9571mwv_gpio_id_table[]?
You still need the "bd9574mwf-gpio" entry, don't you?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
