On Monday 22 Feb 2021 at 16:31:08 (+0000), Vincent Donnefort wrote: > I suppose, a way of fixing this, is to keep cpu_util_next() the way it is to > get the appropriate frequency at which the CPU would run once the task has > been > enqueued, for the 'max_util', and have 'sum_util' being the sum of the pd's > util > (without the task) + task_util_est().
You read my mind :)
