On Monday 22 Feb 2021 at 16:39:47 (+0000), Vincent Donnefort wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 04:23:42PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Monday 22 Feb 2021 at 15:58:56 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote: > > > But in any case, if we're going to address this, I'm still not sure this > > > patch will be what we want. As per my first comment we need to keep the > > > frequency estimation right. > > > > Totally untested, but I think in principle you would like something like > > the snippet below. Would that work? > > You preempted my previous email :) > > Yeah, that looks like what we want, I'll give a try.
Cool, thanks. And ofc no strong opinion about the implementation details, this can most certainly be optimized in some way so have fun :) Cheers, Quentin