On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 15:15 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new > > "cycle_accumulated" field. Does it really need to be > > John, > > Before we hardcode these names, can we change them? Later in the series I > use something called 'cycle_raw' which really should be called > 'cycle_accumulated'. Since cycle_accumulated IIRC can go backwards.
Err... I don't think the current cycle_accumulated can go backwards. Or maybe I'm missing what you mean. > Or do you think I should rename cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic? That's fine by me either way. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
