On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:06:55PM -0700, Haitao Huang
<haitao.hu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> +static void sgx_epc_cgroup_free(struct misc_cg *cg)
> +{
> + struct sgx_epc_cgroup *epc_cg;
> +
> + epc_cg = sgx_epc_cgroup_from_misc_cg(cg);
It should check for !epc_cg since the misc controller implementation
in misc_cg_alloc() would roll back even on non-allocated resources.
> + cancel_work_sync(&epc_cg->reclaim_work);
> + kfree(epc_cg);
> +}
> +
> +static void sgx_epc_cgroup_max_write(struct misc_cg *cg)
> +{
> + struct sgx_epc_reclaim_control rc;
> + struct sgx_epc_cgroup *epc_cg;
> +
> + epc_cg = sgx_epc_cgroup_from_misc_cg(cg);
> +
> + sgx_epc_reclaim_control_init(&rc, epc_cg);
> + /* Let the reclaimer to do the work so user is not blocked */
> + queue_work(sgx_epc_cg_wq, &rc.epc_cg->reclaim_work);
This is weird. The writer will never learn about the result of the
operation.
Thanks,
Michal
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
