Hi Thomas, On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 at 12:47, Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-01-06 12:40:12+0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 at 23:14, Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]> wrote: > > (...) > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile.nolibc > > > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ DEFCONFIG_riscv32 = rv32_defconfig > > > DEFCONFIG_riscv64 = defconfig > > > DEFCONFIG_s390x = defconfig > > > DEFCONFIG_loongarch = defconfig > > > -DEFCONFIG_sparc32 = sparc32_defconfig > > > +DEFCONFIG_sparc32 = sparc64_defconfig > > > > How can we test sparc32 using a 64-bit kernel? > > CONFIG_COMPAT=y
FWIW, testing 32-bit userland on a 64-bit kernel is something completely different... > Please note that this changed in (the now committed) v2 anyways: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Sorry, I hadn't noticed the newer version, as the latter does not include some keywords to trigger my interest ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
