Xu Du wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 6:58 AM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:14:05 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > For instance, can the new netlink code be replaced by YNL, whether in > > > C or called from a script? > > > > +1 looks like YNL is already used in net/ tests, and it supports > > the operations in question, so that's a much better direction. > > Please let us (YNL maintainers) know if there's anything missing > > or not working, IDK how much use the rtnetlink support in YNL is > > getting. > > > > Thank you for the suggestion. I am looking into replacing the netlink > with YNL to reduce code. But after reviewing rt-link.rst, I found that > rt-link currently lacks support for VXLAN. Would more significant changes > to the patch be acceptable if I switch to Geneve to leverage YNL?
These are only changes to the new code in your series. SGTM. I assume it is not a significant burden as the two are fairly similar. Is that correct? Eventually it may be nice to have VXLAN support in YNL akin to Geneve support. But sounds like a separate goal.
