On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
> >> It has not crashed yet with the patch though.
> > 
> > It seems that one of the tweks in this patch made the watchdog
> > act better than before.  So unless I hear from you (before the
> > start of next week) that some other message appears, or that your
> > oops re-appears, I'll submit some version of this patch for RC3.
> 
> OOPS'ed again after some hours. The OOPS looks identical to me besides 
> all kind of other crap mixed in the trace due to a lot of unrelated 
> activity going on.
> 
> Quite a lot of the same IAA messages (status 8029 and 8028, cmd 10021) 
> in /var/log/debug prior to the crash, over the entire uptime time span.
> 
> This was with the first patch posted only. Not any of the other ones.

Hmm ... I'd have expected some other IAA/IAAD message too.


> > And if you're up for it, I may have another patch for you
> > to try on top of this one ... I had an idea about IRQ trigger
> > modes that might be causing this problem.
> 
> It'll have to be tomorrow. Should I throw in the anti-oops patch too?

Sure.  I expect you'll see the stacktrace then, instead of oopsing.

You might turn that one IAA message into an ehci_vdbg() call
instead of an ehci_dbg() call, since  the data it gives isn't
useful.  That would reduce the amount of log noise you seee.

- Dave
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to