On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > > > Unfortunately it did not work. The clock state did not change by > > writing MR register. > > Ok, thanks for testing. > > In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected > permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings > before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't > know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases.
The rm9200 special cases which, ISTR, still don't work right ... > So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it > for 2.6.26. > > David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask > Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm? It'd be good to let Andrew have your ack. It's already in MM, so if I don't need to sign off it's nice to have less to do there. :) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
