On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:11 +0100 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work > > > > toward at the power management summit several years ago > > > > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes. > > > > > > I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie > > > s2ram to hal, because it makes testing on minimal system hard. > > > > > > Anyway, what is the "default" way to trigger s2ram for Andrew? Perhaps > > > Fedora already has his machine whitelisted... > > > > There is no s2ram. pm-suspend uses the white/black-lists in pm-utils. > > Remember that? The cross-distro package everyone agreed was a good idea > > so that every distro didn't have their own magic utility ? > > Well, we have cross-distro package, it is at suspend.sf.net , and it > can bring up video - which is kind of important. (It is single binary, > so it can be pagelocked -- which is important for s2disk). > > Plus it does not depend on HAL. Meanwhile, my computer continues to not work. First thing we need to do is to work out why it won't stay suspended? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
