On 19 February 2013 11:29, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 18 February 2013 16:40, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2013/2/18 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>: >>> On 18 February 2013 15:38, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I pasted the original at: http://pastebin.com/DMm5U8J8 >>> >>> We can clear the idle flag only in the nohz_kick_needed which will not >>> be called if the sched_domain is NULL so the sequence will be >>> >>> = CPU 0 = = CPU 1= >>> >>> detach_and_destroy_domain { >>> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL); >>> } >>> >>> dom = new_domain(...) { >>> nr_cpus_busy = 0; >>> set_idle(CPU 1); >>> } >>> dom = >>> rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom) >>> //dom == NULL, return >>> >>> rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, dom); >>> >>> dom = >>> rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom) >>> //dom != NULL, >>> nohz_kick_needed { >>> >>> set_idle(CPU 1) >>> dom >>> = rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom) >>> >>> //dec nr_cpus_busy, >>> } >>> >>> Vincent >> >> Ok but CPU 0 can assign NULL to the domain of cpu1 while CPU 1 is >> already in the middle of nohz_kick_needed(). > > Yes nothing prevents the sequence below to occur > > = CPU 0 = = CPU 1= > dom = > rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom) > //dom != NULL > detach_and_destroy_domain { > rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, NULL); > } > > dom = new_domain(...) { > nr_cpus_busy = 0; > //nr_cpus_busy in the new_dom > set_idle(CPU 1); > } > nohz_kick_needed { > clear_idle(CPU 1) > dom = > rcu_dereference(cpu1_dom) > > //cpu1_dom == old_dom > inc nr_cpus_busy, > > //nr_cpus_busy in the old_dom > } > > rcu_assign_pointer(cpu1_dom, dom); > //cpu1_dom == new_dom
The sequence above is not correct in addition to become unreadable after going through gmail The correct and readable version https://pastebin.linaro.org/1750/ Vincent > > I'm not sure that this can happen in practice because CPU1 is in > interrupt handler but we don't have any mechanism to prevent the > sequence. > > The NULL sched_domain can be used to detect this situation and the > set_cpu_sd_state_busy function can be modified like below > > inline void set_cpu_sd_state_busy > { > struct sched_domain *sd; > int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > + int clear = 0; > > if (!test_bit(NOHZ_IDLE, nohz_flags(cpu))) > return; > - clear_bit(NOHZ_IDLE, nohz_flags(cpu)); > > rcu_read_lock(); > for_each_domain(cpu, sd) { > atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgp->nr_busy_cpus); > + clear = 1; > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > + > + if (likely(clear)) > + clear_bit(NOHZ_IDLE, nohz_flags(cpu)); > } > > The NOHZ_IDLE flag will not be clear if we have a NULL sched_domain > attached to the CPU. > With this implementation, we still don't need to get the sched_domain > for testing the NOHZ_IDLE flag which occurs each time CPU becomes idle > > The patch 2 become useless > > Vincent -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
