On 09/02/2013 01:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> As Michael point out, We used to limit the max pending DMAs to get better 
>> cache
>> utilization. But it was not done correctly since it was one done when 
>> there's no
>> new buffers submitted from guest. Guest can easily exceeds the limitation by
>> keeping sending packets.
>>
>> So this patch moves the check into main loop. Tests shows about 5%-10%
>> improvement on per cpu throughput for guest tx. But a 5% drop on per cpu
>> transaction rate for a single session TCP_RR.
> Any explanation for the drop? single session TCP_RR is unlikely to
> exceed VHOST_MAX_PEND, correct?

Unlikely to exceed. Recheck the result, looks like it was not stable
enough. Will re-test and report.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vhost/net.c |   15 ++++-----------
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index d09c17c..592e1f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -363,6 +363,10 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>              if (zcopy)
>>                      vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
>>  
>> +            if ((nvq->upend_idx + vq->num - VHOST_MAX_PEND) % UIO_MAXIOV ==
>> +                nvq->done_idx)
>> +                    break;
>> +
>>              head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
>>                                       ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
>>                                       &out, &in,
>> @@ -372,17 +376,6 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>                      break;
>>              /* Nothing new?  Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
>>              if (head == vq->num) {
>> -                    int num_pends;
>> -
>> -                    /* If more outstanding DMAs, queue the work.
>> -                     * Handle upend_idx wrap around
>> -                     */
>> -                    num_pends = likely(nvq->upend_idx >= nvq->done_idx) ?
>> -                                (nvq->upend_idx - nvq->done_idx) :
>> -                                (nvq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV -
>> -                                 nvq->done_idx);
>> -                    if (unlikely(num_pends > VHOST_MAX_PEND))
>> -                            break;
>>                      if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
>>                              vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>                              continue;
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to