From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces.  This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do.  However, the uses in
bond_change_active_slave() and __bond_release_one() are legitimate:
They are assigning a pointer to an element from an RCU-protected list
(or a NULL pointer), and all elements of this list are already visible
to caller.

This commit therefore silences these false positives either by laundering
the pointers using ACCESS_ONCE() as suggested by Eric Dumazet and Josh
Triplett, or by using RCU_INIT_POINTER() for NULL pointer assignments.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: bri...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 72df399c4ab3..bbd7fd3e46fe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct 
slave *new_active)
                if (new_active)
                        bond_set_slave_active_flags(new_active);
        } else {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, new_active);
+               /* Both --rcu and visible, so ACCESS_ONCE() is OK. */
+               ACCESS_ONCE(bond->curr_active_slave) = new_active;
        }
 
        if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
@@ -1801,7 +1802,7 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
        }
 
        if (all) {
-               rcu_assign_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave, NULL);
+               RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->curr_active_slave, NULL);
        } else if (oldcurrent == slave) {
                /*
                 * Note that we hold RTNL over this sequence, so there
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to