On 29.04.2015 01:12, John Stoffel wrote: >>>>>> "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <h...@pobox.com> writes: > > Havoc> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> I find dbus to be extremely hard to debug when my desktop starts doing >>> things I don't want it to do. The fact that it might be flinging around >>> hundreds >>> of thousands of messages, and that this is something we want to encourage, > > Havoc> This particular argument doesn't resonate with me ... if dbus > Havoc> is hard to debug, it's not as if "ad hoc application-specific > Havoc> sidechannel somebody cooked up" is going to be easier. > > When Ted is saying it's hard to debug... then maybe it's a bit crappy > in design or implementation?
There is a very nice tool to debug the traffic for kdbus. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2014-March/016178.html Also the patched wireshark makes it as easy as analyzing network traffic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
