Purely out of curiousity: is this new parser libgmp? If not, have you considered using libgmp? Hell, I don't even know what libgmp "really does", other than act as some IEEE-oriented math library... ;-)
Food for thought. And I hate math, by the way. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. | On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:00:07AM -0500, Jeremy Nelson wrote: > The new math parser was first written about 7 years ago and hasn't had > any significant changes for 2 years, despite rather signficant use by > several scripts. So it's stable. > > It hasn't been turned on by default because it's not backwards compatable > (natch), and some people have depended upon the bugs in the old math > parser. However, it has always been expected we would flip the two, and > the new math parser would be the default and you'd have to /xdebug old_math > to get the old math parser. > > It seems that this might be the time to do this change-over. This means > that going forward, epic5 scripts need to be new_math compatable. > > Does anyone have any comments they'd like to make about this before it > happens? > > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@epicsol.org > http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@epicsol.org http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
