As one who fishes, the only reply possible is "Errrr...?"

Eugene

-----Original Message-----
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of 
Daniel Winheld
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:52 PM
To: Luca Manassero
Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Chanterelle choice?

If Mimmo could sell loaded gut/nylgut bass strings ("Bass" fishing?) to the 
fishing industry the availability could go up and the price would come down. 50 
meters for 6 Euros anywhere on the planet is fine with me.

Dan

On May 9, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Luca Manassero wrote:

>   Hi,
>   I am using fishing nylon since now about 4 years with perfectly fine
>   results. It's plain, cheap and sings pretty well. And you can easily
>   buy more than 50 meters for about 6 Euros (at least in Italy).
>   Of course, you have to carefully measure the string length of your new
>   lute and use a string calculator to get the right thickness. There's an
>   excellent free lute string calculator here:
>   [1]http://calc.lauten.com/en/strcal_en.htm
>   My case: I have two Renaissance lutes (6 and 8 course) tuned in "real"
>   g (AD0Hz) with a string length of 63cm. They both use 0.45mm fishing
>   nylon for the first course.
>   Have fun,
>   Luca
>   [2]theoj89...@aol.com on 09/05/12 19.57 wrote:
> 
> I bought a 7c ren lute strung in Nylgut. I love the Nygut, except for 
> the chante relle, it just doesn't seem to feel or sing as strongly as 
> I wish - it seems thi n. Do others have this problem? If so any 
> suggestions, I've thought of going bac k to a nylon (which would be 
> thicker?). Thanks in advance trj
> --
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at 
> [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
> References
> 
>   1. http://calc.lauten.com/en/strcal_en.htm
>   2. mailto:theoj89...@aol.com
>   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 





Reply via email to