Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 um 15:52:22, schrieb José Abílio Matos 
<jama...@lyx.org>
> On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15.25.12 WEST Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > There is one task remaining. Creation of lyxrc.defaults uses string
> > > > 'python' as executable even if lyx is configured for use with python3.
> > 
> > > I agree that this could change.
> 
> Actually here I meant to say not just that it could but the it *should* 
> change.

Cmake part is ready.

> > > > I had to edit this file to get the desired python3 to run the converts.
> > > > (Example: \converter fig        pstex      "python -tt
> > > > $$s/scripts/fig2pstex.py $$i $$o"        "")
> > 
> > > Honestly here I suggest us to change this automatically for users.
> > > If the first command is python we should change it to the python version
> > > configured. If the user wants to use a different python version the user
> > > is
> > > free to use say "python2 -tt ..."
> > > 
> > > For example in my system where python is python2 I have:
> > > $ ll /usr/bin/python
> > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 Jan 12 18:00 /usr/bin/python -> python2
> > > $ ll /usr/bin/python2
> > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 Jan 12 18:00 /usr/bin/python2 -> python2.7
> > > 
> > > And that has been like this for ages. 
> > 
> > yes, it is the same here. But I don't want to change the symbolic link
> > because it may influence some other programs.
> > Instead I'd prefer to have an option to tell lyx to use python3 for handling
> > of lyx-local python scripts.
> 
> In case it was not clear I mean that we should do it inside lyx because the 
> python2 and python3 names are *always* available.
> 
> So in every place where we have the python name as the first command we 
> should 
> change it to python2 or python3, like if in a sense python meant $$python 
> that 
> we replace by the appropriate python name.
> 
> This way it will work for everyone and someone that needs can pin the python 
> version by directly placing the major version in front of the python name.
> 
> I hope that this is clear now. :-)
> 
> Regards,

Thanks for clarification. Yes, better as an option since it does not need user 
intervention.

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to