Paul Medwell wrote: > Although it is possible to create the bib file entirely by hand in a > text-editor, you may find it easier to use a bib file editor. I use > tkbibtex, although emacs has a BibTeX editor mode and is probably just as > good, if not better. There are a heap of others out there as well.
Hi, Steve, I have to support this. Although I do not like Emacs (to say it mildly) and do not have it installed, I have to admit that from among BibTeX-in-texteditor, its bibtex-mode is _by far_ the best what I've seen, and particularly vim's bibtex mode is just a joke. Alternative to Emacs bibtex-mode are different BibTeX-as-database programs -- tkbibtex, or (what I've used) pybliographer, or Java jabref. You will be certainly much better with them, than just with vim (although that's what I use most of the time -- sometimes I use Kate). Best, Matěj -- Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 When you're happy that cut and paste actually works I think it's a sign you've been using X-Windows for too long. -- from /. discussion on poor integration between KDE and GNOME
