> > There's still arguably a role for a lean IDE like MC as a test bed for > discerning whether a given issue encountered in LC is in the engine or the > IDE. But given the many enhancements in the engine, attempting to maintain > MC as a productive alternative delivered a lower ROI than simply moving the > things we like about it into LC. > -- > Richard Gaskin
Seems your opinion does not apply to my reasons :) -- Use an alternative Dictionary viewer: http://bjoernke.com/bvgdocu/ Chat with other RunRev developers: http://bjoernke.com/chatrev/ _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
