In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>When rel-license is inside an hReview, it is taken to be associated >with the review, rather than the larger fragment it would otherwise >be associated with (e.g. post or page) > >I wonder whether that makes sense more generally - things apply at the >finest level of granularity at which it mkes sense - so rel="bookmark >self" applies to the microformatted content it is most directly >descended from. >Are there reasons people think this is a bad idea? Yes - a parser at that level of granularity will understand that, but not something paring the whole page for licenses, which may have been written before the more granular uF was created. I've raised this issue previously, when the example was a page about an individual, with their genealogy, and an hCard for their dead parent. Tagging that hCard "deceased", as is currently suggested, would be interpreted (or at least implied) by some parsers as tagging the subject of the page as deceased. -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss