that (restoring consistency with ksh93/bash) would be good, I believe. subtle incompatibilities in behaviour (as opposed to syntax differences causing manifest syntax errors) are the most painful when porting scripts between shells in my experience, especially because they might be missed during (imperfect) testing and only surface much later in a bad way. so trying to avoid such incompatibilities seems beneficial. this assessment also applies to the issue I reported here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mksh/+bug/1857702 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of mksh Mailing List, which is subscribed to mksh. Matching subscriptions: mkshlist-to-mksh-bugmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857195 Title: here string behaviour different in mksh and ksh93 Status in mksh: Triaged Bug description: consider IFS=$'\n' x=(a "b c") cat <<< ${x[*]} cat <<< "${x[*]}" cat <<< ${x[@]} cat <<< "${x[@]}" executing this in mksh (or zsh, incidentally) yields the output a b c a b c a b c a b c (i.e. identical output, always inserting first IFS char between elements, for all variants of accessing all elements of the array) while ksh93 (or bash, for that matter) yields a b c a b c a b c a b c (i.e. `*' behaves different from `@' but double quoting is ineffectual). I am not sure whether this is a bug (either in ksh93 or mksh) but wanted to report this inconsistency and to ask for clarification. what I _would_ have expected to start with is, that the above "here string" commands would yield the same output as print ${x[*]} print "${x[*]}" print ${x[@]} print "${x[@]}" which is neither true for ksh93 nor for mksh. is this all good and well and I am only overlooking something obvious? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mksh/+bug/1857195/+subscriptions
