> What exactly is "good" with OpenBSD? I summarize the issues in my last email
> So again, what is "slow"? The machine running OpenBSD. Compared to similar ThinkCenters I have (m73 Tiny and m92 Tiny). Also a Raspberry Pi 3 (running OpenBSD at lowest freq). It seems not to be the SSD disk because the "slowness" is present when writing to MFS mounts. > 14 Watts for compilation or just idling? Just at idle. Granted OpenBSD tends to run quite hot compared to alternatives it still seems to draw more than the m73 and m93p. > What issues? I mention them in the last email > Might be, but you didn't checked by tests. Yes, of course you have to > use the same "C program" as before. I tested against different operating systems and different hardware. As mentioned there is definitely something up with this combo but I haven't had time to explore further. Hence my general note to avoid this machine if people can for now (if they want something guaranteed working). The C program can be as simple as compiling "Hello World" to exhibit the issue. Takes about 15 seconds to compile "Hello World". It doesn't need to be a "test" to suspect things aren't quite right here. > I suspect something different, I guess it is from the black / red > combination of the case colors. This is a broken combination and a > dangerous one in art and design. The m73 and m92 have similar case colors. So it is definitely not that ;)
