On Dec 13, 2007 4:58 AM, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from > > running non-free software? Not I. I think that software is > > unethical, and I refuse to install it, or suggest it to anyone. But I > > have not proposed that systems actually block its installation. > > Yet you were in an interview where you argued against using OpenBSD, > because it permits users to run non-free software. > > Your argument was that OpenBSD contains non-free parts in it's > ports tree. > > This has been proven to be false. > > Here, go have a look > > ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/poerts.tar.gz
The correct URL is: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/ports.tar.gz (~13.5M) -Amarendra > It's just an entirely free scaffold of Makefiles and little patches. > Nothing more. It is 100% source, and it is 100% free. > > If you are going to go around making pronouncements from your pulpit, > you might want to go educate yourself. > > But once again, you failed to educate yourself before you opened your > big fat mouth on a talk show and stated utterly uneducated and false > statements . You have had ample opportunity to say "I was wrong", yet > you have not done so yet. > > You keep argueing, and that is because you are a coward.
