Title: RE: Getopt::Long wishes (was: RFC: Getopt::Modern)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, June 27, 2005 9:46 AM
>
>Anyway, the next version of Getopt::Long will have the ability to use
>an arbitrary array instead of ARGV.
>
> Now, do you want this to be yet another "if the first argument is an
> array reference ..." or yet another :config option?
>

Imo it would better to expose a different subroutine name for this.

Ie:

sub GetOptions {
  GetOptionsArray([EMAIL PROTECTED],@_);
}

Is that ruled out for some reason?

Yves


Reply via email to