On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0100, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > String::ParsableInterpolable > > Surely we can do better than that?
Actually, I'm not even sure on the "parsable" part now. Parsing would imply some sort of possibly-recursive, context-aware grammar system. This is much simpler - just literal strings with regexp-matched substrings in them. Perhaps more Matchable than Parsable. String::MatchInterpolate maybe? -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
