On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:30:56PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > I don’t know what it means for something to “sound like a > namespace.” :-) > > Also, I think of templates as generally reversible anyway. > Think of printf/scanf, strftime/strptime, URI::Template, > etc. String templates often go both ways.
Well, most of the decent-sized template modules on CPAN aren't inherently reversible... Consider Template::Toolkit, Text::Template, HTML::Template, Mason,.... Also, String::Template sounds too much like Text::Template, which it isn't really.. It's a totally different idea. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
