* Paul LeoNerd Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-24 19:40]:
> Also, String::Template sounds too much like Text::Template,
> which it isn't really.. It's a totally different idea.

Not to me. “Text” to means a document (or some arbitrarily small
unit of a document) that has meaning to a human. A “String” is a
data type consisting of an ordered sequence of characters – an
entity in terms of computing.

Admittedly the difference may appear sort of hand-wavy, but to
me, “Text::Template” and “String::Template” convey extremely
different things.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to