On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
It does seem that way. I've rewritten most of the network code in
LambdaMOO 1.8.1+foo, since it was, well, ancient and disgusting. (sorry,

So we have lambda+foo, GammaMOO, etc, ... it seems awful that we need all this forking.
against the CVS tree on Sourceforge, and to pick someone as release coordinator, for something we can call 1.9.0 or 2.0.0?

Historically, as I'm sure you're all aware, the only reason for these forks is that moo-cows and similar contact with the 'main' 'developers' has been intermittent at best. And when people have tried to make contact in person, there's been no response.


If it's a good time to get all of these forks re-synced, then please please do so. Also, the folks at Moo Canada have some wonderful code that deserves to be integrated (such as the mentioned unicode support)

Rob

      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805
,'---/::::::::::.    University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::.  L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to