I've done some testing on Lame, Mp3Enc31 and
BladeEnc, encoding a 262sec. song (45.2Mb).
I used a 600Mhz pentium III with Win-98, and the
EXE from the russian site.
CBR, high quality (-h / qual 9), full
freq. range (-k)
Mp3Enc31 BladeEnc
Lame3.61 Lame3.60
192
(-ms)
586
166
118
60
128
(-mj)
795
182
163
90
VBR, high quality (-h), full freq. range, -B
320
~192 (-ms, -V2, -b
128)
651(!)
273
~128(-mj, -V4, -b
112)
408
193
The settings give avg. bitrate of 198 and 133 in 3.61, the
same settings is used in 3.60 and give avg. of 212 and 148, is this because of
changes in the -V parameter ?
Before 3.61 was released there was some writing
about faster VBR-performance, is that gone because of the Huffmann-search
?
When will the history-file be updated with the 3.61-changes
?
Thanks,
Peter
|
- Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Peter Olufsen
- [MP3 ENCODER] REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST PLEASE! l
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Peter Olufsen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Dmitry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed Robert Hegemann