On Sunday 07 May 2017 16:18:09 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > > I think every language should be as simple as possible. > So, if you can mix every Pascal concept in just one concept, called > object, it is better. > > But if you care about programmers that came from another language and > you care if they are confortable using the same concepts they have in > another languages, it is up to you decide if it worth continue with > this concepts. > > Classes should not exists in object-oriented programming. This is a > mistake. Only objects should exists.
In MSElang "class" = "^object" on heap. So you mean there should be no object heap pointers but stack allocated objects only? I probably misunderstood. > I'm following and participate (more or less) of a new language called > EO https://github.com/yegor256/eo that do not have classes, NULL and > other things that should not exists in OOP. > That looks a little bit abstract to me. A general purpose programming language should be handy and not necessarily academically clean. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
