On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:46 , "Keith J. Schultz" <keithjschu...@web.de> wrote > > I see no advantage in your suggestion. just search the subject. > > As for the [***Spam***] that is inroduce by mail servers. A user should maybe > remove > it to avoid it. But a nuisance, yes, a problem no. > > regards > Keith.
and on 20 Mar 2013, at 19:21 , Mica Semrick <paperdig...@gmail.com> wrote > > > I would agree with the (no subject) or SPAM titles, but if your search tool > can't tell the difference between "\column, Bug in - " - "\column, Bug in > \column" and "Bug in \column" then you probably need to find a new search > tool. I subscribe to the list in non-digest format, e.g. I get every > email. I used to get it in digest, but I found that made my searching > tougher. I use gmail and have all the list messages skip my inbox and go > directly to a tag. This has helped a ton! > > -Mica > > Am 20.03.2013 um 16:12 schrieb Robert Blackstone > <blackstone.rob...@gmail.com>: > >> …. wouldn't it be a good idea to ask everybody to clearly state the subject >> of their message, preferably starting with the most important keyword, and >> in particular to avoid (no subject) or [***SPAM***], and similar things as >> subjects. ... >> .. Hi Mica and Keith, Thanks for your reaction. It is informative to hear your opninon. I did not want to start a discussion -- it was rather a "cri de coeur" born out of frustration -- so I will leave it at this. Best regards, Robert ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
