What are those again? -----Original Message----- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 1:03 PM To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?
It's also a push to start implementing PAWs - Protected Access Workstations - which is how I'm going to configure my next machine. Kurt On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolutions.com> wrote: > I prefer remote management, actually. The insane thing is how easy it is to > build out Nano servers. That another reason; not having a local GUI will > prevent me from always using RDP; trying to move away from that as much as > possible. > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Matt Stork > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:38 AM > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server > Core/NanoServer over Linux? > > Running Core and Nano does not mean running without a GUI, they mean running > without a GUI locally. The majority of the server management GUI tools can > connect to a remote server (Core, Nano or Desktop), it is a matter of having > your firewall and authentication setup to allow this. The transition is > difficult but unless we wish to fall like the mainframe people who refused to > adapt, this is technology we must learn. > > Nano is new but Core has been around since Server 2008. I would not call > that new. > -Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 9:18 AM > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server > Core/NanoServer over Linux? > > That’s the difficulty I’m having; currently, I’m the only one in my group who > sees any benefit to the ASP.net platform, for instance (I’m a DNNizen, and > trying to rise in prominence in that community, for example). Why run ASP.NET > when you can run Wordpress, they say. Why run IIS when PHP was born on > Apache, they say. The other issue I have is that when dealing with creatures > of habbit, it’s hard to get people to look at current stats. I tend to use > what works, not what the market tells me I should, for the most part. Does it > have to do with what you were brought up with? Plus because Core and Nano are > new; so I think in my case the issue is getting people who are used to one > thing to get used to another. There’s that saying, use the right tool for the > job, so how to ensure that you choose the right one when both can perform > equally well? I’m an explorer, so it’s easy for me to say, let’s try > something new and fun. > > > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Charles F > Sullivan > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 9:50 AM > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server > Core/NanoServer over Linux? > > > > Yes, people usually do run Linux servers without a GUI. What I meant was that > you can use Windows Server Core or Nano to avoid the Windows GUI, thus not > having to use Linux to get those benefits. > > > > As someone else said, it depends on what the application is as to what > platform is more appropriate. I think that’s the real answer. > > > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> ] On Behalf Of Rene de Haas > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 6:49 PM > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server > Core/NanoServer over Linux? > > > > You can run linux without a gui. > > > > Op 1 jun. 2017 11:54 p.m. schreef "Charles F Sullivan" > <charles.sulliva...@bc.edu <mailto:charles.sulliva...@bc.edu> >: > > Or maybe you could say “Why use Linux when you can use Windows > without the overhead and security vulnerabilities that go with a GUI?” > > > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> ] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server > Core/NanoServer over Linux? > > > > Hey all, > > Just had to ask this one. I’m really curious because I’ve heard the > argument, well, if you’re going to run server Core, why not just use linux? > What can you say to make the conversation worthwhile and not just arguing > preferences? Or is that really what it’s all about these days? Iv’e been > wondering what the people who have been on both sides might say. >
