On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:24 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: > > OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over. We ask people who > are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev; this is > not the same thing as being an "innocent bystander" asking a question or > making a comment - I retract the request. > > Now, does anyone have anything useful to say about OP's original second > problem?
Yes: write a proper docstring, or find me a better way to automatically create the docstring of a function from the docstring of the corresponding method (or vice-versa) than we have now for numpy.ma. I agree that the current method is not ideal, but at least you get some kind of info. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
